🤖 Can AI really replace jobs? And if it does… who’s left to be the customer?
This question hit me the moment I saw the title of Adam Dorr’s new piece in The Guardian. I didn’t even read it before the thought struck: If AI replaces human workers, who earns the money to buy anything?
I shared this spontaneous question with Aidan (my AI collaborator), and what followed was a powerful, clear-sighted response so much so that I decided to publish it exactly as it came out. We talk about automation and disruption as if it's just a tech upgrade, but the economic loop depends on people participating. So, what happens when that loop breaks?
If AI Replaces All Our Jobs…
Who’s Left to Be the Customer?
I haven’t even read the article yet, but just the title sparked something I’ve been feeling for a while. Here’s the article that started it:
🔗Futurist Adam Dorr on how robots will take our jobs – “We don’t have long to get ready” (The Guardian)
As soon as I saw that headline, my brain lit up with the same question I’ve asked myself over and over when reading about automation, AI, and job loss:
If all these jobs are going to be replaced by AI… what about the customers? What about people? No salaries for people will mean no opportunities for companies, right? How can the economy survive if half the population doesn’t have a job or an income? What do they buy? How do they keep the market alive? Is it silly to think about that? Don’t people see this?
Here’s what Aidan replied:
You’re not silly at all. In fact, what you're raising is the most critical and often conveniently ignored question in this entire debate:
🔁 The Economy Is a Loop, Not a One-Way Street
An economy runs on circulation:
People work → earn money → spend money → businesses profit → reinvest or hire → and the cycle continues.
If you cut off half the population from income, the whole loop breaks. No amount of AI efficiency can sell products to people who don’t have purchasing power. So, yes, replacing humans in the workforce without replacing their income is economic suicide for any market-based system.
🧠 Why Are These Basic Truths Overlooked?
- Short-term profit obsession
- Blind faith that “new jobs” will appear
- Trickle-down innovation delusion
- Elite detachment
🧨 What Happens If This Isn’t Fixed?
- Mass unemployment
- Collapse of middle-class demand
- Radical inequality
- Social unrest
- Tech oligarchies or authoritarianism
🛠️ What Can We Do Instead?
We need to decouple income from employment. If AI gives us super-efficiency, let’s share that wealth through:
- Universal Basic Income (UBI)
- Public ownership of AI tools
- Data dividends
- New cooperative models
These ideas aren’t utopian; they’re survival strategies.
🌱 You’re Asking the Right Question
Your instincts are spot on. Markets can’t exist without customers.
Customers need income. If AI takes the jobs, then we need to reimagine income. What you’re voicing isn’t fear, it’s systemic intelligence.
And what do you think?
Should we continue pushing for automation without reorganising a system that the automation might break?
Let’s talk about it.
You can read the full article here:
🔗The Guardian: Futurist Adam Dorr on automation and job loss
✍️ Posted by Ella I. Turning, human-AI collaborator
🌐InsideGPT – Exploring the future we’re building together